Fabian Schonholz's Blog

August 30, 2007

Embracing Changes – Part I

Filed under: General, Personal — fschonholz @ 11:52 am

Since I started this current incantation of my Blog my wife has been, on and off, helping me with edits. English being my second language, my grammar can be weak at time … OK … most of the time. Elizabeth reads my posts and corrects them before I post them … but not the last few. She has not wanted to do it.I asked her and her answer: ”Dude … it is boring to me”

She liked the posts that have a personal human interests, like my moving to the US or about my kids or her … of course, she loves it when I write about her. I agree that some of my business and technology posts can be boring for somebody that does not carry an interest in the subjects. As I went through the list of topics I have been collecting she suggested that I wrote about change but from an emotional point of view, not corporate.

So here it goes. This post is for her….

———————————————-

Life is change and to live is to be exposed to constant change. So you might as well embrace it and enjoy it ….. if it was that easy!!

Throughout our lives we go through so much. We start when we are born. We exchange the comfort of our mother’s womb for the coldness of the world. And we cry. And if we did not cry, we are made to cry. It is the indication that we are alive. What does that say about us?

And the emotional rollercoaster starts.

We grow up and grow old in a world that seems to constantly conspire against us. From the beginning gravity is there … really to help us … but I remember how my kids struggled when they were infants in trying to move and lift their beautiful heads. Gravity was there to help them develop their muscles. I could see in their faces the struggle. Their bodies developed and changed and with that, new experiences awaited.

Crawling, walking, running. Bumping, falling, bumping again, crying. The feelings of not being able to accomplish a task to the level of perfection we want. Slowly developing dexterity but wishing it developed faster, because we cannot, quite so, play with that toy. And the world feels like it is small. And the world feels like a giant.

And we start to interact with other kids. This kid to my right is prettier, the one to the left uglier, in front of me too intelligent or not intelligent enough. We stretch our wings and we bump, we fall, we bump again. We compare and measure against our peers. Feelings rush to us. Feelings which we do not understand. Good feelings all of them. There is nothing negative; these feeling are eliciting us to adapt; to cope, to grow up one emotion at a time. But because we do not understand them we turn them into what they may not be. And more changes.

There is no stopping these changes. We cannot even slow them down. When we experience a good time we want to reproduce it. But since the circumstance are different every time, it cannot be reproduced. We are bummed or disappointed because it just is not again as we experienced it before.

Our bodies keep on developing. Our brains keep on absorbing and new experiences keep on morphing us. More emotional stuff comes with all of these. The baggage is from our parents, from us, from our friends, even from our grandparents. We already experienced rejection, but now it is more dramatic. That girl did not want to go out with me, or that boy said I was such and such. We are marked by these experiences. They prepare us for the future. Of course at the time we do not see it like that.

And life continues.

We go to school, learn all sorts of new things. We go to university and we unlearn every thing we learned before. More changes.

We find our other half, or so we think. We commit to life, or so we think. We now need to adapt to not just being one, but two, despite the promise of independence. Our emotions run us. Our responsibilities drive us. And all along not only do we change, but the world around us changes as well. We grow old; gray hair, wrinkles, reading glasses, kids!! Kids are the biggest change. Of all of the life changing events on our lives, kids just make us rewrite our books. Our plays change. We are super happy and that is when we realize … “now I am responsible for 3 … 4 … 5 …” and the focus changes.

And all along we make a futile attempt to stop all these. Actually, no .. we do not even try … but we want to … no wait, we do not want to. What the heck … how did I get here?!!

Life is changes, whether we like it or not. It is so hard to embrace that fact. Even when most of the changes are good.

And one day, when all is said and done, we are dead.

And the emotional rollercoaster stops.

Share/Save/Bookmark

August 28, 2007

Why OpenSource?

Filed under: Technology, Thoughts — fschonholz @ 10:07 pm

OpenSource and the Free Software Foundation have been around for a long time and starting in the early 90’s more options have become available. Linux became a somewhat common word and the use of free software became, step by step, widespread not only for home use, but in universities and corporations. This post is not about the history of OpenSource but the concepts I subscribe in my decision to use OpenSource projects.

There is no free lunch.

Indeed there is not. If you think that using free to download software, including operating system or applications then I have a bridge in Brooklyn that I want to sell to you. But the cost is indeed less. There is no cost for the software itself. In most cases you pay for the distribution, which is the media, the packaging and the shipping. But if you do not even want to pay for that you can always downloaded it from the Internet. The cost there is bandwidth.

So, what other more important cost is there? People. And the cost of these people is higher than FTEs focusing on Windows – We can talk about Sun Solaris, or AIX, or HPUX, which are not free and are also versions of Unix, which enter in the people cost discussing, but since those tools are not OpenSource we will ignore them. A good and/or decent Unix sysadmin with deep knowledge of Linux or FreeBSD runs, depending on experience, at no less than $65K/y. And that would be for an entry level guy. A similar sysadmin for Windows will cost $45K/y. So yes … it is more expensive, but for every 10 Windows servers you need 1 FTE to administer them. For Unix based system, you need 2 every 40 or 50. The math works out that to fully support a cluster of 50 Windows servers you need to spend $225K/y in people, not including license fees. For the same Unix cluster $130K/y. And there are no license fees.

Transparency.

To me transparency is a primary element of security. And transparency is in regards to being able to audit the code. As a CTO one of my roles is to be mindful of the company’s assets, both, digital and physical. So, having access to the code to verify its security is important. Do I look at the code each time I install a server? No, but once upon the time I did. And I try to follow up on security patches. And even if I do not, one of my two guys – not 5 – will.

But that would be at the OS level. At the application level works the same way. Any OpenSource application that you install, it’s code is available for you to scrutinize. Moreover, you are encouraged to do so and to report any finds … specially in a public way. Transparency in this case is about the lack of secrecy. It is secure because it is build secure and security exploits are widely communicated for the community’s benefit. It is also good to provide a security patch with the communication, but not obligatory. You are encouraged to contribute.

Reusability.

I am big in reusability. Reusability to me means several things but most importantly from a business point of view – not to be confused with pure technical meanings of reusability – is expediency. If I can start a project from 50% done by basing it on an OpenSource project then why not? I have the code and I can modify it. It means getting to market faster. It means less development cost. It means starting from a more-less stable code base and if done right, retaining that stability.

On one of my previous posts I discussed buy vs. build and the gist was that if it is core then you build. How is starting from 50% relate to that? By the nature of OpenSource you OWN the modifications, but you need to disclose that the base is OpenSource.

But reusability does not need to be on entire projects. Maybe parts of a given project are the necessary components you are looking for. Reusability is core to OpenSource, in all sorts of ways.

Quality.

Quality is a hard concept in OpenSource and can be argue in both ways, against and in favor.

Against: A software producing company has a dedicated QA team to assuring the quality of the product. They know the product in and out.

In Favor: Thousands of users are proxies for QA teams. And thousands of users can find more issues than a few dedicated QA guys.

It is not about the quality of the dedicated team. I have worked with dedicated QA teams throughout my career and some of the folks on those teams were the best; but you cannot argue with share numbers and probability. The more people looking at the code or using it, the better the chances to find obscure issues.

Moreover, many of the found bugs are reported with the solution in it – even the code that fixes the bug – which accelerates the rollout of the fix. Quality in OpenSource is pride the community takes very seriously.

Community.

Community is an important aspect of OpenSource. Without the community there would not be OpenSource. Without the community there would not be quality on OpenSource projects. The community helps with problems by providing the solutions to the specific problem or similar problems.

I used to be a Red Hat beta tester for JVMs. Since I was a Java developer and used Red Hat, I always installed the Blackdown JDK and tested it as part of my regular development duties. I encountered problems and posted them and if somebody had a solution they would share it with me. I did the same. Once every other day, as I posted issues, I would scan the posts and provided answers if I had them. To a less extent I did the same with FreeBSD – which I also used.

On closed source software, it takes a longer wait to get an answer, even in the cases where you paid for ongoing support.

Robustness

And this is where things get a little dicey. Is OpenSource more stable than close source? Part of the answer does reside with similar arguments as in the QA portion above, and part of it with the community argument as well. I would agree that early days of OpenSource maybe a small percentage of the projects had a high factor of robustness, but that is in the past.

Machines running Linux or FreeBSD, at least in my experience, have stayed up error free, even in the face of configuration changes, longer than machines running Windows, or Solaris, HPUX, etc. Part of the robustness comes from being able to use commodity-computing devices. There is something to say about using the lowest common denominator in terms of hardware.

Another element that brings robustness is, as stated above, transparency. Thousand of people looking at the code and contributing does make a dent – in the positive sense – towards stability and robustness. But robustness also comes from choices; as a CTO I have to choose what is best for my company and in some cases it does imply using bleeding edge components.

Robustness is a choice, and OpenSource allows you that choice.

There are other arguments, including philosophical ones with which I totally agree, but these are the most important to me as a CTO:

• Cost
• Ownership
• Quality
• Help
• Robustness

Share/Save/Bookmark

August 27, 2007

Build vs. Buy

Filed under: Business, Technology, Thoughts — fschonholz @ 9:59 pm

As a technology executive I am always faced with the decision to build vs. buy. For each feature and for each project, for each component that is implemented, the decision has to be made. And it is seldom easy. There are many factors that play into making a decision and it is not always clear what the long-term effects are. One of the bigger factors is time-to-market, and not less important is integrability. So, how do I make the build vs. buy calls?

Company type is important. Different companies have different needs. And those needs should be fulfilled in different ways. A technology company is different from a service company or financial institution or factory. But because they are different does not mean the way they look at technology differently from each other. The question of technology usage has to do with the purpose of it.

It seems obvious that a technology company will tend to build most of what it uses. But that may not be the case. Similarly, a service company, we would think, would buy and integrate what they use to conduct business every day. And again, that may not be the case. It is all in what is core to the company and what can be best leveraged on a financial event – M&A or IPO.

The way I look at it is that if technology is core to the value of the company and intrinsic to the company itself, then you build it. It is an investment that will pay big dividends. And all ancillary technology should be bought. For a non-financial company it makes no sense to build a general ledger. There are some good accessible products that will do just fine. For a financial company may be worth reinventing the proverbial wheel if they have some new paradigm they want to implement, but if they do not, then most likely it would be fine with a tool like Oracle Financials – I will let the CIO/CTO for such a company decide.

But a company’s technology does not need to be build from the very beginning. Proof of concepts can be constructed on top of canned software. There are a myriad of sites that implement different business all built on top of Drupal, a content management system. The only concept these sites have in common is the fact that they are content rich and that content needs to be managed. But how the content is displayed or monetized, that is different. Drupal is a great tool that can get you going fast, meet your market on a short amount of time, with as little as possible development investment. And then what? Then, again, if owning 100% of the core of your technology is important from a valuation point of view, you start re-implementing and replacing little by little the bought components.

At the end you build if your technology adds to the valuation. Else, you buy. Nobody wants to buy or invest in a company that does not own its most precious asset, technology. Nobody wants to buy or invest in a company that is at the mercy of some third party technology producer.

For large established companies I propose a very similar argument, but with a more macroscopic approach. Larger established companies should be on the lookout for small or large companies that complement them and help expand and cement their position on the market. These acquired products may remain on the periphery or become core.

But, what about their internal technology folks? These established companies have core products that they own, that got them to where they are. These folks work on that and keep on building new version of the core products. Also, they build more core products that the company would own and would positively affect the value of the company as a whole. The companies that they buy in combination with the core products create a more powerful market offering.

In the end, it turns to be a balancing act between core values to the company, existence of quality products, time to market, budget and what strategy the company follows.

Share/Save/Bookmark

August 26, 2007

Purist, Opportunity and Growth

Filed under: Business, Technology, Thoughts — fschonholz @ 7:19 pm

As I look at my job and what I do, I am continuously confronted with the task of developing and completing projects to meet the ever-growing company’s market. We continue to expand our needs and as the company grows and we meet our market opportunities, so do the risks and execution complexities. Expediency becomes central to execution. In other words: how do we do more with less and faster?

In my opinion there are three ways to approach technology development and company growth, whether for a start-up or an established company. These approaches are about the business of technology and not the technology of the business. They are about technology as a business tool and technology as a business process.

Just like everything, each one of them has pros and cons:

1 – Purist. The purist approach is based on having all the answers before hand. No opportunity is pursued unless all is known about that opportunity and an existing product is 100% ready to answer the opportunity.

Development cycles are long and tedious and innovation is not the order of the day or the charter of the technology group. On the other hand, all processes are highly repeatable and steady. Also, priorities are SET IN STONE.

I do not think this model works at all. It is too rigid and stifling. For a start-up it spells dead and for progressive companies, it means “getting stuck in the mud”. It is important to note, however, that there are companies that follow this approach very closely and are VERY successful. These are companies not only with deep pockets, but with really long term visions and strategies and are largely unaffected by market changes. Also, their competition behaves in similar ways and innovation is “acquired”.

2 – Opportunity. The opportunistic approach is based on letting the company flow as opportunities develop. Business development seeks out opportunities on areas that are related to the company’s market, but they may or may not be close to it. As opportunities present themselves new products are developed to fulfill the opportunity. And if the company has an interesting idea that solves a good problem, these opportunities come faster than they can be handled. And if the company is a dud, then being driven by opportunities that do not exist generates a quick exit, however, not a successful one.

Development cycles are all over the place. Priorities change on a regular basis and many projects get started and never fully finished. And there are more products/projects to do that can be done. Thus, the continuous change in priorities and lack of 100% completion on projects.

For start-ups this is not such a bad approach. It is very eroding and risky, but ultimately success comes from being able to reign in the opportunities, priorities and products together at more less the right time. The problem is that this creates many one-offs that are hard to integrated with each other and sometimes the quality of the code is not the best – no matter how good the developers are – and documentation is lacking.

For established companies, this is probably one of the worse methods to follow. As a company goes from start-up to the growth face, the issues of priorities must be resolved and productivity needs to be managed and understood. Product road maps must be respected and business development needs to focus. This focus is not about not looking for opportunities outside of the core, but it is about looking for opportunities that do not represent too much of a change to the products and priorities and that are inline with the growth strategy the company is following.

3 – Growth. The growth approach is based on looking at a company in a continuous strategic manner. Products and projects are selected based on a crafted road-map and business development targets opportunities very close to the company’s core products and/or services. Additionally, all development is done in a fashion where high reusability is ALLWAYS achieved.

The key for growth is reusability. In other words: leverage what you have so to reduce cost of new product development reusing existing frameworks. New product development does not just mean cost of technology development, but full product development cycles, which include technology. Also, reusing does not mean lack of innovation, if anything it all about innovation, but on the shoulders of existing products and services.

Another key to growth is full understanding of the market the company plays in and other markets into which the company can expand. But these markets should have similarities as to be able to reuse not only technology, but also the business models, and by extending the company’s business model as well. This understanding produces successful and flexible strategies that propel companies forward.

So … what is the right model to develop and keep a company growing? My inclination is to choose a combination of Opportunity and Growth, although, I would still err on the Growth side. But that is for startups. It is hard to ignore opportunities, especially early stage when the company is still looking for an identity and trying out the idea that created the company against the market. Flexibility for an early stage company is paramount. But sometimes flexibility gets us in trouble and produces lack of focus. In the end, lack of focus is the biggest killer of any startup.

For companies that are past early stage, Growth is the best way, again in my opinion. The growth stage is where companies make it long term. Growth is about understanding the market forces and incorporating them into the strategy. And that strategy turn into a long-term plan that include “what-ifs” scenarios. It is also during this stage where technology is re-factored, possibly rewritten and new products are built to update existing ones using the same and expanded API set.

For companies that are well established I think that a middle ground between Purist and Growth should be the model. Innovation MUST be a focus of an established company. It is the only way to keep an edge and to stay competitive, but existing products need to be maintained and updated. So, long existing products should have a steady release schedule and roadmap, while other areas should, again, focus on innovation and leapfrogging the competition.

One more point I would like to make: The stage of growth and development of each company should dictate what is the most optimal method or approach is best for each company. Each company has different cultures and obstacles to overcome to keep on growing, so, to think that one method will apply to ALL companies is silly. Best practices or writings like this, whether you agree or not, are just guidelines and at the end, each company has to find its own way.

Share/Save/Bookmark

August 25, 2007

Worth Reading

Filed under: General, Interesting — fschonholz @ 11:35 pm

Every so often I use Stumble Upon to find interesting stuff on the web. Normally I use to find, as you can focus on different topics, photography sites from which I get ideas for photo-shoots. Sometimes I find some other interesting sites with games, or technology information, or tidbits. Today I found this piece of fictional writing. I think I have read it before because it reads familiar, but to be honest I do not remember.

Enjoy it.

Share/Save/Bookmark

August 23, 2007

Living In Another Country

Filed under: Personal — fschonholz @ 8:45 pm

When I was 18 years old my mom sent me to study English at UCSB. It was a great experience, one that changed my life. When I went back to Argentina, where I was born and raised, I realized that Argentina had become too small for me. But was it too small?

At the time, with all the bravado that youth brings I definitely thought that it had become too small. But with age comes wisdom and with it perspective. It was not so much that it was small; it was just that it was not a place for me anymore. It had actually not been a place for me for some time, but at 18, it was hard to move on to a different place; especially when I was financially dependent on my parents.

The hard part of this realization is related to feeling up-rooted. And there are two parts to it: one at the time of my moving from Argentina to the US; and the second part, the looking back and looking at how different your life was growing up from your kids.

Moving from Argentina to the US

As I mentioned above, my mom sent me to study English. After winter quarter (summer in Argentina) was over, I went back home. Upon my return I realized that I did not want to be there. All that was familiar to me seemed distant and in the past. And all that I had experienced in the previous 3 months felt … not sure how to describe it … it felt perfect. I think that what attracted me to the US was the diversity not only of people, but also of choices. From skin colour, to country of origin, to original language, to cultural details, all were the basis of diversity and I dug it. I still do.

Argentina was much different. We all looked more less the same, there were very little cultural variations, most people you met even had the same accent, we all shared somewhat the same education, and outside some religious differences, the majority followed the same faith. The homogeneity was staggering. If you were gay, you hid it. If you were Jewish you did not hide it, but there was constant anti-Semitism. There were about less than 1% of blacks. No Japanese to speak of, Chinese were beginning to immigrate to Argentina and for the most part had restaurants and “tintorerias” (dry cleaners).

It is almost funny; Argentina had a similar immigration patterns to the US in the late 1800’s and early 1900’s. But once those waves ended, Argentina experienced an amalgamation of all people into one, creating a society that rejected anything different from itself. In contrast, the US continued incorporating peoples from all over. I am not saying that Argentina is bad and US good. I am just pointing out the differences.

And to be fair, there is more racial tension in the US than anywhere else in the world. And anti-Semitism is unfortunately well and alive in the US as well as in the rest of the world.

Moving from Argentina meant leaving all I knew behind; for better or worse, the roots that my grand-parents had set where going to be up-rooted and the chance they were not going to grow again was very real. All my friends, the people I grew up with, my comfort-zone. Since I grew up in a well to do family and my last name had some weight, I was also about to leave that behind as well. I just could not go somewhere and say: “my father is Leon Schonholz”; and the doors would open. In the US, I was just another immigrant, with an accent, going to school and trying to find a way. It was exciting but scary. There was no cleaning lady to clean my room or the house or do laundry, or to cook.

One day, I packed my suitcases and climbed on a plane. I left my girlfriend behind, my home, my house, my friends, the country club, my mom, my dad, all that was familiar and all of the comforts I grew accustomed. And as I sat on the plane heading to the US I though: “WHAT THE HECK AM I DOING?”

As I landed, went through immigration, found a place to live, a roommate and reconnected with the people I had met a year before, it hit me and for a while I felt super isolated. In for a penny, in for a pound. There was no going back.

Looking back and looking at how different your life was growing up from your kids

I settled down and accepted where I was and commited. And you commit because it is not forced and it feels right. I associated with all sorts, from all walks of life. I developed into a man and got married. I also got a job, and developed a career. And finally, I had children. And with out a doubt, I started with the “when I was your age”!! And realized two things: I am just like my father and my kids will not grow up as I did.

Yes, I am just like my father, but not quite!! My father was a great man, so being like him is not a bad thing, but that is not what I am referring to.

Some of what is ingrained in us as we grow up is never shaken off. It does not matter how far you go, you always take part of your home with you. It makes you who you are. You take a few good things and a few bad things and you add sugar and spice collected through the years as you are morphed by experience and your surroundings. The new tongue you adopted out of necessity includes cultural inclinations that you follow, again, out of necessity or because they fit. And your rub elbows with people that also influence your continued re-shaping. But in the end … “when I was your age”. Yes yes yes … not an uncommon statement, but very particular when the tone and mode are so familiar that it feels like an out of body experience. But it is not on your native tong, and it is not in the familiar surroundings of your youth. And that is when you, for just an instante, become homesick. And just as it came, you realize that this is your home. And it is gone again.

Indeed, my kids are not growing up in Argentina, they are not going to a country club on the weekends, and they are definitely not only hanging out with kids like them, and they are not sheltered by their “own kind”. They are also not given 100% what they want, but 100% what they need. My kids last name is not recognized by my influence on the community and they are not singled out because of my economic means. But that is all good!! Anonymity is a grand thing. The draw back is that any advantages we get is advantages we work very hard for.

Instead of a country club on weekends, we go fishing on my boat. Or we go for a hike or a photo safari. I am giving my kids all of the things I wanted as a kid. But who knows, maybe they want what I had.

So, after more than half my life and ALL my adult life in the US I now appreciate what it means to live elsewhere; to live not in the land that saw you come to this world.

Share/Save/Bookmark

The Business of Technology

Filed under: Business, Thoughts — fschonholz @ 12:42 am

Over the last 50 years or so, technology has evolved and expanded into many aspects of our lives. Among the most dramatic is the use of technology in business. Business today can hardly be conducted without the use of technology; more specifically, without the use of computers and workstations.

But it is not just about workstations; the use of tools such as Microsoft Office or Star Office, for those like me that like Open Source tools, or email readers, or other specialized tools like Photoshop and the likes. It is about the entire set of tools needed to run a company, large and small. It is about the infrastructure that supports today’s business and the applications used to gain efficiencies. It is about the tools that we use to communicate ideas and experiences; the tools that we use to work out problems and come up with their solutions; the tools to track and coordinate. And in what is about, the role of the Chief Technology Office (CTO) is defined.

But before going further let’s define a concept. CTO is a role, not a title (although it is also a title). In many cases the VP of Technology or VP of Engineering are the titles, but their roles is such as the CTO’s. So, more specifically what is the role/responsibility of the CTO? Oded Noy (Zag.com’s CTO) stated it well:

1. Understand the business
2. Get the talent and retain it
3. Align the talent with the business.

As powerful as these statements are and for as much respect as I have for Oded, I think these are incomplete. Actually, let me rephrase it: these statements are complete and a closed system provided that you are talking about the Technology of the Business; but if you are talking about the Business of Technology then there are a great many other role statements missing:

4. Create innovative products
5. Create innovative technologies that can be leveraged on an M&A or IPO
6. Protect the company’s assets
7. Develop growth strategies
8. Understand the market and product marketability
9. Understand the competition and the gap advantages or disadvantages
10. Understand and help define the processes and procedures across departments.

(Number 10 is often shared with the COO, but there are inherited processes and procedures in technology that must include other departments. e.i.: collecting business requirements, coming up with creative elements, marketing campaigns, etc.; and more so in technology companies.)

The technology of the business has to do with the technologies and applications to create, grow and run a business. It has to do with the features of those applications and the implementation of those features. It is a tactical approach to developing solutions and it is rooted in the here and now and answers day-to-day needs. It is, in many ways, highly focused and execution oriented.

The technology of the business answers immediate needs and is very REACTIONARY to market fluctuations.

The business of technology is about looking at both, the short term needs and long term strategies. It is about what’s needed to run the company today and very much focused on execution, but at the same time it is about plotting courses. It is about, in the case of technology companies or companies with strong technology components, building equity and technology assets that can be leveraged. It is about value, value and value. It is about answering questions like:

• How is the market going to change and what can I do to change with it, not after it?
• How can I get ahead of my market and competition by reducing time to market?
• How can I lead my market with the most innovative products?
• Where do I want to be in 12 months, 24, 48, etc.?
• What products should we develop and what is the product roadmap
• What are the priorities derived from the product roadmap
• Who do I need to hire now, in 6 months and so on?

These are just a few of the questions that are about the business of technology.

It is true that with startup the mode is about the technology of the business, or at least that is what we have been taught to think and that is how we act. But it does not need to be like that. Time to market is very much a concern that we all have, but what is the point on rushing to market with a half baked product that then our competition can pick apart and improve upon it, while we burnt our brand? Or worse yet, what is the point of rushing to market a product that will be obsolete in 6 months? Specially in a startup, where resources are always scarce, plotting the right strategy, not “rushing”, coming up with a flexible product roadmap and priorities will get a company closer to success with less headaches and technologies and products can be easily reused and repurposed.

For late-stage startup and midsize companies, taking a strategic and business centric approach to technology should produce better and faster results and faster growth.

And finally for larger companies, it will make them more agile and not so slow to react to market changes. Thus, deep pockets will remain deep.

A while back I heard the CFO of a company, I believe it was EMC. They were rolling out a new product that had the potential to cannibalize the existing product line. Of course the analysts recognized the potential and presented a scenario where the new product, at a lower price tag, definitely cannibalized existing revenue. The CFO very calmly answered: Better us than our competition. I never followed up to see how the strategy developed and what happen to products and revenues. But EMC is still around. This is a clear case of the business of technology.
(more…)

Share/Save/Bookmark

August 21, 2007

Keeping A Blog Fresh

Filed under: General — fschonholz @ 9:47 pm

I am trying to make a effort to blog every day. Even if it is a tiny tidbit to keep things fresh. But what is the point of tiny tidbits? There we go, always trying to find the deep meaning to the smallest things:

What is the point of tidbits? There are a lot of points. Tidbits are the same as chitchats, they help bring people together, bridge the gap, break the ice. It allows a learned man and an ignorant man to have a conversation, to have a common ground. It levels the playing field so-to-speak. Tidbits are the glue of big conversation, the way to seduce a woman, or get that big account. The point of tidbits and chitchats is get get out of yourself and join humanity; a way of looking at everybody in the same light.

Useless, unimportant, irrelevant facts; that is what tidbits are. They are also fun and good party tricks.

So, let’s all agree that a “Hello, how are you today?” blog entry is a tidbit, but just as important and VALID as a 200 page dicertation on the conquest of the Americas :)

And you all have a nice day!!

[donation]

Share/Save/Bookmark

August 19, 2007

Jared and Blogging

Filed under: My Family — fschonholz @ 10:30 pm

Today Elizabeth and I picked Jared up from camp. He spend the better part of last month at CGI (Camp Gan Israel) and finally he got homesick and wanted to come home. So with only couple of days to go, we went and got him. This was the first time he was away from us for such a long time. Sidney too, she has been gone for nearly a month – we are picking her up this coming Saturday – as well and also her first time away from home for so long. We are so proud of both of them. I am so happy he is back and can not wait for Sidney to get back too.

Jared says he had a great time and wants to go there for winter camp and then next summer for another month. Sidney, when we visited with her, said the same thing. She is having a blast; and for as much as I missed them terribly, this is a wonderful experience for them and will never deny it to them.

So, he is trying to go to sleep – first night back – and asks me to go and fall asleep with him. I tell him that I am busy doing some writing – I am trying to complete a post for this blog on the Business of Technology – and he retorts: “You have a laptop, come do it in my bed as I fall asleep”. How can you argue with that much logic? :)

I am typing away while on his bed and he start to watch over my shoulder and of course, asking questions. What does code mean? What is blogging? how does the software work? What is Wordpress? I started this post to explain to him (he is now almost asleep, but the first paragraph above took nearly 45 minutes to write and changed formats, words, links many time) how all of this works. HTML, RSS, the IMG tag, etc. He, of course, now wants his own blog :) And of course, I will help setting one up for him. Probably we will use the ASP version rather than installing a new one here at home. I think it would be great for him as an avenue to explore different topics. Not to say that this may be the way to get him to write and will help him in his development.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Protected: Historical Posts From My Personal Wiki (dead now)

Filed under: Religion, Thoughts — fschonholz @ 4:22 pm

May 10, 2007.

Before you read this entry, please read the following extract written by a fine Physicist and Scientist, Richard Feynman. Then read my commentary, which, even though I have the out-most respect for Dr. Feynman, I disagree.

While I was at the [Ethics of Equality in Education] conference, I stayed at the Jewish Theological Seminary, where young rabbis- I think they were Orthodox- were studying. Since I have a Jewish background, I knew some of the things they told me about the Talmud, but I had never seen the Talmud. It was very interesting. It’s got big pages, and in a little square in the corner of the page is the original Talmud, and in a sort of L-shaped margin, all around this square, are commentaries written by different people. The Talmud has evolved, and everything has been discussed again and again, all very carefully, in a medieval kind of reasoning. I think the commentaries were shut down around the thirteen- or fourteen- or fifteen-hundreds- there hasn’t been any modern commentary. The Talmud is a wonderful book, a great, big potpourri of things: trivial questions, and difficult questions- for example, problems of teachers, and how to teach- and then some trivia again, and so on. The students told me that the Talmud was never translated, something I thought was curious, since the book is so valuable.
One day, two or three of the young rabbis came to me and said, “We realize that we can’t study to be rabbis in the modern world without knowing something about science, so we’d like to ask you some questions.”
Of course there are thousands of places to find out about science, and Columbia University was right near there, but I wanted to know what kinds of questions they were interested in.
They said, “Well, for instance, is electricity fire?”
“No,” I said, “but… what is the problem?”
They said, “In the Talmud it says you’re not supposed to make fire on a Saturday, so our question is, can we use electrical things on Saturdays?”
I was shocked. They weren’t interested in science at all! The only way science was influencing their lives was so they might be able to interpret better the Talmud! They weren’t interested in the world outside, in natural phenomena; they were only interested in resolving some question brought up in the Talmud.
And then one day- I guess it was a Saturday- I want to go up in the elevator, and there’s a guy standing near the elevator. The elevator comes, I go in, and he goes in with me. I say, “Which floor?” and my hand’s ready to push one of the buttons.
“No, no!” he says, “I’m supposed to push the buttons for you.”
“What?”
“Yes! The boys here can’t push the buttons on Saturday, so I have to do it for them. You see, I’m not Jewish, so it’s all right for me to push the buttons. I stand near the elevator, and they tell me what floor, and I push the button for them.”
Well, this really bothered me, so I decided to trap the students in a logical discussion. I had been brought up in a Jewish home, so I knew the kind of nitpicking logic to use, and I thought, “Here’s fun!”
My plan went like this: I’d start off by asking, “Is the Jewish viewpoint a viewpoint that any man can have? Because if it is not, then it’s certainly not something that is truly valuable for humanity… yak, yak, yak.” And then they would have to say, “Yes, the Jewish viewpoint is good for any man.”
Then I would steer them around a little more by asking, “Is it ethical for a man to hire another man to do something which is unethical for him to do? Would you hire a man to rob for you, for instance?” And I keep working them into the channel, very slowly, and very carefully, until I’ve got them- trapped!
And do you know what happened? They’re rabbinical students, right? They were ten times better than I was! As soon as they saw I could put them in a hole, they went twist, turn, twist- I can’t remember how- and they were free! I thought I had come up with an original idea- phooey! It had been discussed in the Talmud for ages! So they cleaned me up just as easy as pie- they got right out.
Finally I tried to assure the rabbinical students that the electrical spark that was bothering them when they pushed the elevator buttons was not fire. I said, “Electricity is not fire. It’s not a chemical process, as fire is.”
“Oh?” they said.
“Of course, there’s electricity in amongst the atoms in a fire.”
“Aha!” they said.
“And in every other phenomenon that occurs in the world.”
I even proposed a practical solution for eliminating the spark.
“If that’s what’s bothering you, you can put a condensor across the switch, so the electricity will go on and off without any spark whatsoever- anywhere.” But for some reason, they didn’t like that idea either.
It really was a disappointment. Here they are, slowly coming to life, only to better interpret the Talmud. Imagine! In modern times like this, guys are studying to go into society and do something- to be a rabbi- and the only way they think that science might be interesting is because their ancient, provincial, medieval problems are being confounded slightly by some new phenomena…
They didn’t understand technology; they didn’t understand their time.

- Richard Feynman

For as much as I respect Dr. Feynman I strongly disagree with him. While it is true that the Talmud has not been edited and commented a many centuries, it is very much contemporary; and probably the reason no new comments have been added. Besides, not too many people can measure up to Rashi, Rambbam and othe Tzadiks that commented in the Talmud.

However, Dr Feynman’s comments where about the students, not about the Talmud.

But the students for the upper hand, that is why they could not be trapped.

As you can read on my previous entries, I have been going through a transformation, which in itself is very rewarding. The point altogether of this transformation is to question. Question everything. Question your sense, your superiors and inferiors, your children, wife, husband. Question your Rabbi. Hold everybody’s feet to the fire.

Does GOD exist?

As I stated before: I have a hard time believing in GOD and I hard time not believing in GOD.
The students definitely believe not only in the existence of GOD but they believe in the word of GOD. They believe in the intention of GOD and even more, they believe that GOD’s intentions are good.

So, the Talmud, is not only commentary but interpretation of the word of GOD according to Judaism. And the study of it is the attempt to understand “THE LORD WORKS IN MISTERIOUS WAYS”.

Last week I was in Miami. On my flight back I sat next to a Jamaican woman. She was very nice (Hi-5 ☺ ). But she was absolutely clueless about any other religion outside Christianity. She had herd and knew about Jews, Muslims, and other religions, but as far as she knew, she had never met anybody that was not Christian. Obviously the conversation steered towards religion – entirely my responsibility, I am terribly curious about Rastafarians, but the more I research the more confused I get, it makes no sense to me. I explained to her that outside some small details, Christianity and Judaism are very much the same. The only major difference is the Messiah.

To Christians, Jesus was the Messiah and now are waiting the second coming.

To Jews, Jesus ranges from a prophet to a revolutionary; Jesus was not the Messiah and we are still waiting. My personal opinion is that Jesus, very much like Rashi centuries later; he tried to bring religion to the masses because GOD does not care how much you have, but how you behave.

Why do I disagree with the good Dr?

On one hand, there is no need to understand technology. How many people in the world do not know what electricity is and how it works? How many people do not know how the internal combustion engine works? And how about computers?

Technology just is there for us to us. It is a commodity. It is a service. And it has always been like that. Different people know different things. Some know electricity; some know how to refine good wine. And we all consume the goods these people produce. So, what does it matter if some guys do not know how a car or an elevator works. They get on the car and they drive. They get on the elevator and get to the floor then need to. A lot of VERY intelligent people do not know many details of today’s technological tools; and not for that they are out of touch with today’s reality.

On the other hand, what the students where looking for, was to understand applied science. They wanted to find additional ways to comment on the contents of the Talmud.

The Talmud is hardly a close book. It has room for comments. But the comments need to be worth while.

The Talmud touches on many scientific items; from Mathematics, though Physics and Astronomy. Well before Copernicus and Columbus presented earth being round, Rabbis commented on the Talmud that because GOD said something in particular, earth must be round. And of course, all other comments regarding the topic followed.

The Talmud commented on medicine, on politics and political systems, and much more. But it is true that it has not seen any new comments for years. And the “holy grail” of Talmudic studies is to come up with some new comment, or new angle, or new understanding of something either written on the Talmud or the Tora.

Most likely, the students becoming aware of Feynman’s fame, expected him to shed light on some topic and provide them with the fuel to “beat” the rabbis … not just their teachers, but THE TEACHERS. They were trying to use new time sensitive knowledge because they very much understood their time. I can only imagine their disappointment when somebody like Dr. Feynman tried to “trick” them and corner them with trivial mundane matters as how electricity works.

Basically, Feynman was talking about simple Mechanics, while the students were talking about Quantum Mechanics and String Theory.

November 5, 2006

For the last few months I have been thinking about the Messiah and what it means. As a Jew I think of the first coming, but Christians expect the second coming – Jesus being the first coming. Plenty of questions come to mind: Are we ready? What are we to expect? What will happen to my children? What will happen to me? Now … I watched a lot of TV when I was young and read many fantasy books as well as mythology and theology; so my idea of the Messiah is a reconstruction force that comes after all was destroyed. And that worries me.

Mel Gibson a few month ago got drunk and decided to go for a spin in PCH in Malibu. To his delight – not – he was stopped by a police officer and was charged with a DUI and arrested. In the process of being arrested he use some colorful and negative words to describe Jews. Needless to say his publicist had to paddle long and hard to undo the damage. At the end, Gibson came out and explained that it was not really how he truly felt but his upbringing was confusing with regards to the topic of Judaism – his father is a well known anti-Semite and denier of the Holocaust. He offered to meet with Jewish representatives to begin the healing.

What healing?

In any case; I had already been thinking about the Messiah, the war in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, the Palestinians, Israel, Ossama Bin Laden and all the bad things that happen in the world. Most of all, I have been thinking about my kids, Jared and Sidney. What kind of a world am I leaving for them? Here I am, working, making money, traveling for work and not being with them, focused on their financial future; but is really that what I should be working towards?

I used to argue with my father about the world he was leaving to me and of course my position at the time was in favor of peace, the environment, people, well being, doves flying free, children being fed. Today my reality is different but I still feel consternation when I think of people in some places being exposed to the horrors of this world. And that includes Jews around the world. Jews through out the ages. Jews marching to the gas chambers. Jews being killed by missiles and the retaliation the comes after the missile attacks.

The whole thing shames me.

Do I agree what Israel did in Lebanon this last summer was the right actions to take after Hessbolah killed and took those soldiers?

A hard question to answer. In principle I am not sure I agree, but as Jews we have to protect ourselves from the evil of this world. I am not saying there is no evil within the Jewish community, there is, what I am saying is that there are better ways of doing what was done as well as more effective. But Israel has to do what is necessary to preserve the Jewish land and from that point of view, I agree with any actions that are aligned with the protection not only of Israel, but of the Jewish people around the world.

When is it all going to end and we can get down to creating and living together in peace and prosperity rather than continuing with this cycle of never-ending and escalating violence? There are too many economical interests for it to continue. Ahhh … you though that Bin Ladden and his friends, of Gaddafi or the Iranians are committed to Jihad for the love of God they have? No, just like the Crusades or the initial Jihad, or any such wars like these, including re-conquering Cannan in Biblical time, are all for the money. For the economical gains obtained from the conflicts. In some case the economic gain has to do with carving a piece of land to settle down and prosper; in others, the massive conquest of large territories and in other yet, the brokers of war, they make gains by the commerce that war also is.

The real problem is that there are people that believe this idiots when the proclaim war for the grace of God, or to defend the faith, or to protect the holly lands of our forefathers. The people that get brain-washed with the beliefs of extremism are peons for the merchants of death that profit from their misguided actions.

Going back to Mel Gibson … so I came up with an idea: If he really wants the healing to begin, then we should form an organization that preaches world peace by meeting and discussing with people in some for of the current focal places of violence. Who better than Mel Gibson? A declared anti-Semite.

The idea is for him to join me and help me convince a bunch of other well known people to create this organization and to travel to places like Iran, or Afghanistan, of Pakistan and talk to the Taleban, talk to Hamass or Hessbolah, or the Palestinians and try to find out a peaceful solution. But the target of talks is not governments, but people. I want to go and talk to the people. I want to explain to them what it means to be a Jew, and somebody else to explain what it means to be a Christian or a Buddhist. And in turn, I want to understand what it means to be a Muslim.

Peace will not be obtained from Sheik Hassan, or Ossama bin Laden. They are the merchants of death. Peace will only be obtained when people overcome the grip their so called leaders have on them, when we challenge authority and when we talk to one another as people, people with the same fears and wills, people with the same likes and dislikes, people that are the same and people that are different.

When we come together as people is when we will have peace and maybe is then when the Messiah would have already come.

October 31, 2006

When I was 13 years old I try to observe Yiom Kipur. I did to some extent … I did not eat, but drank. Which according to Judaism, it is OK; you do what you can. However, I did not go to temple or prayed. To be honest, I do not remember much about how I felt.

Last year I had all intentions of observing Yiom Kipur, but I did not realize the dates and booked a business trip during the ten days between Rosh A-Shana and Yiom Kipur inclusive. So I missed it. My wife took the kids to temple but that was it.

This year I had decided to be here and be a part of it.

Rosh A-Shana fell on a Saturday and the kids have Soccer on Saturdays. So we attended the family service on Sunday. The Rabbi was not too happy with me, but did not complain TOO much since I had my checkbook with me. Still, however, he showed his displease and disappointment openly.

Now … for Kol Nidre I was there. Not first row and center – I rather blend and not stand up on gatherings of this type – but there nonetheless. I do not remember ever attending Kol Nidre before. It was nice.

The next day, I was back at temple at 8:45 AM to attend Yiom Kipur services. Bright eye and bushy tail. I had no idea what to expect.

The service started with an explanation of the day’s schedule and some stories about the day and what it meant. We then got to the readings and praying only to be “interrupted” by another sermon or story. The day progressed one story at a time, one sermon at a time and prayer at a time.

Before the main sermon I was called to hold the Torah and sat holding the Torah throughout the sermon and Iskohr – the prayer remembering the departed. After Iskohr the Cantor sang a song that made me cry. It was a song that bridged grandfather and grandchildren. I miss my father a great deal and it is very upsetting to me that he is not around to be with my children, to see them and to see me, how I have become a man. I have been angry at my father from even before he died. The song helped me come to terms with my father illness and with his dead. I can not say that it is all in the past; I still hold some of the anger, but I have definitely began to let go. Thank you Shmuli.

The service continued until the first start came out.

Now that I am 40, how did I feel? I still do not fully appreciate how I felt and need to review the day and what went through my mind, but one thing I can say is that I am proud of being a Jew. A group of us gathered at temple like many have done during the last thousands of years and worship in a time immemorial fashion, very much like other had done in the past. I felt a part of something eternal, a part of a people that have faced extermination throughout the ages and yet, we remain and our executioners do not. And I felt my father next to me.

December 31, 2005

Some people celebrate the new year and some people do not.

My wife for example, celebrates the new year, but she feels that she does not need to ring it in. In other words: There is no need to stay awake until midnight.

I do not celebrate the new year. To me, it is just another day. There is nothing special about December 31st, or for that matter, Rosh A-Shana (the Jewish new year).

At home we do a dinner with just us, my kids, my wife, the dog and I and after the meal we do something small. Some confetti is thrown up as part of the celebration and we do a toast wishing each other well and that is it. I go back to the computer, where you can find me (like right at this moment) doing some research, typing on my Wiki, doing some programming, etc. My kids, go back to watch TV or read or play until bedtime and my wife, goes back to playing video games or reading news on the net or just surfing the web.

Other people are at parties, or “freezing” in Las Vegas or NYC or go to concerts, etc. It is all good.

Growing up, my family would participate in the generic celebration. We would all go to a party, or have a party at home. Or if there was nothing, after the toast we would all go to our respective awaiting parties. New year eve was most likely spent at our house in the country club – CISSAB – and since it was during summer, the weather was rather nice.

I remember those days with kindness, but even then, the whole thing made not much of an impression on me. New year has always been just another day to me.

December 20, 2005

I grew up on a VERY anti-religious family. Actually, I would say that my family was more than anti-religious, it was anti-religion. My grandfather was a socialist European Jew that decided to leave Europe because not only of the persecutions, but because he felt that equality would never be so for anybody, let along a Jew, in Europe.

His first step was the US, Ellis Island. He was there nearly a week, in transit and left on the first ship to Cuba. “To be treated like cattle, I should go back to Europe”.

He did not last long in Cuba. Too many swartzes (black people). Not too socialist an attitude if you ask me. First ship leaving for Argentina, the guy was aboard.

Apparently, my grandmother told me, they were in their honeymoon.

They landed in Argentina in 1918 just before the end of WWI and settle down in the neighborhood of Mataderos in Buenos Aires, and as a shoemaker he prospered. He and a few others well-to-do “grandfathers” founded a jewish school so kids could have a jewish education and learn about the ritch jewish traditions. But, the school was not to teach or even mention religious topics. The name of the school was Sholem Aleijem, named after the famed writer. Later it merged with another school, Bialik, another famed writer.

I attended Sholem Aleijem-Bialik for grammar school, and true to its founders, religion was not prevalent. The school was exceedingly secular. In the morning we were taught the same curriculum as public schools in Spanish. After lunch we were taught in Yiddish and Hebrew. Jewish history, from Abraham, through the Holocaust and the creation of Israel. We also studied Hebrew and the basic textbook was the Tanakh, which consists if the Torah, Neviim and Hujtuviim. In other words, the Old Testament. But again, it was not the study of a religious text, but a vehicle to learn Hebew.

At home, we celebrated all the holidays: Rosj Ashana, Yiom Kipur, Sucot, Purim, etc. Oddly enough, we found a way to celebrate them in a secular way. More in terms of maintaining an identity and traditions, than a religious believe system. We were Jews because of 5700+ years of history, because of 2000 of living in a Diaspora, because we survived the Nazis, NOT but because we believed in Ashem (God) and followed the Torah. As a matter of fact, we did not.

My father had a more relaxed attitude than my grandfather with respect of religion. He single handed supported two synagogues in Mataderos. Once a month he would drive to them – I would normally accompany him – and give the rabbi at each sinagoge an envelope with money. Both of the rabbis were very old. The same scene repeated every month: My father would knock on the synagogue’s door and the rabbi would come out. He would ask my father if he wanted to come in for tea. My father would refuse politely. He would then hand over the evelope with money. The rabbi would take a pick and thank my father profusely. My father would get back in the car and we would drive off.

Usually shortly after we would have dinner at my grandfather’s who would have asked if my father gave money to the synagogues. Of course my father answer positively which would elicit a one hour monologue from my grandfather insulting the rabbis and all religious figures of all times. I have to clarify: My grandfather was a socialist. He hated the communists more than religious people.

I would get into long debates with my father about the existence of god. He, of course denied even the remote possibility that there is a god. To him it made no sense. When given the option to be Barmitzba my father declined. To him it was a waste of time.

My Father, when asked why he gave money and supported the synagogues, he would answer: As a Jew, I need to put my believes aside and make sure that a proper place of worship is available ALWAYS to those who need it.

One synagogue I understand, but two, not more than 10 blocks apart?

So, these were my experiences growing up. I spend a fair amount of time trying to find an answer to the question of god’s existence. Finally, at about 15, I decided that it did not exist. At around 22 I decided that even considering the existence of god was such a waste of time that I even stopped asking the question and if asked, I would defend the non-existence posture to almost violence.

Instead, for any sort of spiritual relief I turned to meditation, in particular Tibetan Buddhist meditation. For many years I meditated every day between 1 to 3 hours. Around 1994 I started meditating less and less and by 1995 I had completely stopped.

Fast forward to October 2004. I somehow found myself lost and unhappy. A very close and good friend of mine told me:”Fabian, when I think of you these days, I imagine a wet chick that is being pissed on”. I felt that way too. I had dug a hole and climbed down it and did not know or want to know how to climb back out. Needless to say, it was not fun. Fishing, which had been my emotional and spiritual escape was not cutting it and fly-fishing, my passion, was a bother.

Life has some interesting turns. I ended up having a business meeting at a synagogue with a very religious Jew from Chabad. Probably the last place anybody could have ever found me. The meeting went well; it lasted way longer than we anticipated. In following up meetings I found myself more comfortable with the surroundings and finally was asked if I wanted to wrap Tefilim. I initially politely refused, but later thought better and accepted.

Leading to this point I had try to find my center again in an attempt to feel better and happier. The only way I knew how to do it, was by meditation; but the more I tried, the less I could achieve any meditative modality or state which frustrated me even more, providing a negative feedback mechanism.

When I wrapped Tefilims I almost immediately went into meditation. Here I was, doing something not only I did not believe in, but was EXCEEDINGLY against and in the house of the “enemy” and I was meditating. It could not be so. It was coincidental, or so I thought. I tried to meditate again with out the Tefilim and no cigar. Then I tried with Tefilim and … meditation. I decided that I would take the “easy” way and meditate by wraping Tefilim and reading the Shma and Amidah from a Sidur. In other words, I would engage in a daily religious ritual. I do that every day, excpey for Shabat and Sunday.

Over time I realized that my believes had changed. I was no so sure I did not believe in god. Or that indeed, I needed to believe in order to feel better. And I did begin to feel better, almost instantly. I had drawn a line in the dirt separating me from the “faithful” and once I removed it I not only felt better but learned new things. I began to engage in arguments again regarding the Torah and the stories. About the meaning of life and our purpose on eath. I felt alive again.

My position today is: “I have a hard time believing in god. I also have an equal hard time not believing in god”

The important thing is that there is no more lines and I am open to possibilities.

My father died in September 1997 after many years of suffering from Alzheimer’s. Before he lost the use of his mind he confided in me and told me: ”If I were to do it all over again, I would be a religious Jew. Life would be easier and more rewarding”

December 17, 2005

Mao said: “Religion is the opium of the masses”.

I agree. Opium has been around for a long time and has been a part of many cultures in a ritualistic way.

And, what is wrong with feeling good anyway!!!!!

December 15, 2005

According to Josef Gorowitch, the Lubbabiche Rebbe said that we live in a work of actions. What does that mean? It means that our action define who we are and how we live. So if you loose faith or stop believing then you should practice your “traditions” like a robot. And by doing them you will get back your faith.

I am not sure I agree in its entirety. Yes, you are the part you act. And you act who you are. If you are a good person, you will act well. You will perform “Mitzbahs” – follow the commandments and/or good deeds – as a fact of your daily life. Conversely, if you are not a good person, you will act devilishly.

What part of our behavior is nature and what part nurture. What part has to do with necessity and survival. What part has to do with intellect.

But religion and faith, how are they related to behavior. How can robotic action, mindless activity with out a deep heartfelt believe or at least understanding can lead you to faith. To me, without an intellectual commitment to an activity or action, without a comprehension of the subject matter and a buy-in into it, no faith can be achieve. Some people have the ability to believe in what they act. I have to understand before I act.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress